A landmark trial that could reshape how Facebook and Instagram operate is now underway in federal court in Oakland, California, where a coalition of 29 states accuses Meta of deliberately designing its platforms to hook children and teenagers while downplaying the risks. Opening statements began August 18, and the trial is expected to run six to eight weeks, with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg among those expected to take the stand.
How the Trial Is Structured
Four states, California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey, are leading the case on behalf of the full 29-state coalition, which originally filed suit in 2023; the remaining 25 states are expected to pursue separate proceedings later. The case is being heard before an eight-person jury and U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who has also presided over other high-profile tech litigation, including Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI. Notably, the jury will issue only an advisory verdict, while Judge Gonzalez Rogers will make the final determination on Meta's liability.
What the States Are Arguing
California Deputy Attorney General Megan O'Neill told jurors that Meta's business model depends on hooking young users and harvesting their data, arguing the company engineered features like infinite scroll, autoplay, likes, and algorithm-driven recommendations specifically to maximize how long children and teens stay on the platform. California Attorney General Rob Bonta was blunt in a statement ahead of the trial, saying Meta designed a dangerous product for young users, knew it was dangerous, and lied to children, families, and the public about how dangerous it actually was.
The states' first witness was Arturo Bejar, a former Meta safety engineer turned whistleblower who has testified against the company in multiple trials. Bejar told jurors Meta prioritized shipping new products quickly over addressing safety concerns it was already aware of internally.
Meta's Defense
Meta's attorney, Paul Schmidt, pushed back directly on the states' framing, telling jurors that research shows no clear link between adolescent social media use and reduced well-being, and that Zuckerberg's actual goal is building better products, not dangerous ones. In a statement, a Meta spokesperson called the states' claims unsubstantiated and their financial demands vastly disproportionate. The company continues to point to its investment in teen safety settings, content restrictions, parental supervision tools, and age-verification efforts as evidence it takes youth safety seriously.
Why Zuckerberg's Testimony Matters
Zuckerberg is on the states' witness list for roughly three hours of testimony at some point during the trial, though no exact date had been set as proceedings opened. Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri is also expected to testify. Their appearances are widely seen as the trial's biggest moments, since attorneys hope to use internal communications and testimony to establish what Meta's leadership actually knew about the platforms' effects on young users, and when.
Watch full Video
This Isn't Meta's First Loss This Year
The Oakland trial arrives after a string of setbacks for Meta in youth-safety litigation. Earlier this month, a New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address teenagers' mental health after the state's attorney general argued its platforms constituted a public nuisance. In March, a Los Angeles jury ordered Meta and Google to pay $6 million to a young woman who said she became addicted to Instagram and YouTube as a child, in a case that also included Zuckerberg's own testimony. Tennessee is separately pursuing its own trial against Meta over similar claims. Legal observers note the Oakland case is being watched as a bellwether that could shape roughly 1,600 other pending lawsuits from families and school districts.
What's Financially at Stake
Meta has said the case could expose it to as much as $1.4 trillion in penalties, though experts caution that the size of any financial judgment may matter less than the potential for a court order forcing Meta to strip out the very engagement features, like infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations, that the states argue are designed to keep kids hooked. A ruling against Meta could also set a legal precedent affecting the broader wave of youth-safety litigation targeting social media companies nationwide.
FAQ
Will Mark Zuckerberg testify?
Yes. He's on the states' witness list for about three hours of testimony during the trial, though a specific date hadn't been confirmed as the trial opened.
Who else is expected to testify?
Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri is also expected to take the stand, along with former Meta safety engineer Arturo Bejar, who has already testified as the states' first witness.
How is the case being decided?
An eight-person jury will issue an advisory verdict, but U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final ruling on Meta's liability.
How much money is at stake?
Meta has said potential penalties could reach as much as $1.4 trillion, though a court order restricting platform features may carry more long-term consequence than the financial judgment itself.
Has Meta lost similar cases before?
Yes. Earlier this year, Meta was ordered to pay $567 million in a New Mexico case and $6 million alongside Google in a Los Angeles jury verdict, both tied to youth social media harm claims.
Sparrow World News will continue following developments from the courtroom as testimony and evidence emerge in this case.